Texas Jurisprudence Exam Physician Assistant Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Texas Jurisprudence Exam for Physician Assistants with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question offers hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


If a physician assistant suspects a child may be abused or neglected, what is a requirement?

  1. They must report the suspicion within 48 hours

  2. They must advise the child about the resources available

  3. They must wait until confirmed before reporting

  4. They may report at their discretion

The correct answer is: They must report the suspicion within 48 hours

The correct answer reflects a critical obligation that physician assistants have when it comes to the well-being of vulnerable populations, particularly children. When a physician assistant suspects that a child may be facing abuse or neglect, they are legally required to report that suspicion to the appropriate authorities within a specific time frame, which is typically 48 hours. This requirement is crucial as it ensures that potential cases of child abuse or neglect are examined promptly by the relevant professionals who can investigate the situation further and take necessary actions to protect the child's safety. This legal obligation is established to encourage timely intervention, which can be vital in preventing further harm to the child. Reporting suspicions without delay helps ensure that appropriate protective measures are considered and that the child receives the necessary support and services. In contrast, advising the child about resources available, waiting for confirmation before making a report, or the option to report at discretion do not fulfill the legal responsibility mandated for physician assistants in suspected abuse or neglect cases. These alternatives could delay necessary action and prolong potential harm to the child, which is why they do not align with the legal and ethical standards that healthcare professionals must follow when they suspect a child is in danger.