Which of the following is a criteria for identifying exploitation?

Significant gains without informed consent is a crucial criterion for identifying exploitation. This concept is rooted in the ethical framework that emphasizes the importance of a person’s autonomy and informed decision-making. When an individual benefits significantly from another person’s resources, services, or labor without obtaining proper informed consent, it raises ethical concerns. Informed consent ensures that individuals understand the implications, risks, and benefits of their decisions and actions. Thus, when one party gains substantially without this consent, it indicates a power imbalance and potential abuse, which is central to the definition of exploitation.

The other choices do not adequately capture the notion of exploitation. Minor benefits received without permission might suggest a lack of consent but does not necessarily reflect a significant imbalance or harm characteristic of exploitation. Usage of resources for household needs often involves mutual consent and can be seen as part of shared responsibility, not exploitation. Sharing resources with family members typically implies an agreement or understanding and is generally not exploitative, as it often results from cooperation and support within a familial context. These distinctions highlight why significant gains without informed consent is the correct and most relevant criterion for identifying exploitation.